The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15-year-olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK.
The graph compares the number of hours spent by teenagers in the UK on two different activites.
Overall, it is clear that the 10 to 15-year-olds in the UK use more time to play on games consoles than to chat on the Internet. However, a different trend can be observed between the figures for boys and girls.
According to the data, almost 70% of young students spend time playing on games consoles, which is slightly higher than those of chatting on the Internet. Among the ones who play video games, almost half of them play less than an hour per day while only a small percentage spends 4 hours or more. A similar pattern can be seen for those who enjoy chatting on the Internet.
Approximate 85% of boys in the age of 10-15 play video games on a daily basis while only half of the girls engage in this activity. By contrast, the figures for the percentage of girls who enjoy chatting on the Internet is much higher than that of boys and it also outnumbers the figure for girls who play video games.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-29 | bechir sekrafi | 61 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 95
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47027027027 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34646899139 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535135135135 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5387112878 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288670095893 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132151474226 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131401074362 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169461005973 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103358417528 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.