TPO 20
The passage states that because of the large scale of the damage, people called for replacing the "let it burn" policy with a policy of extinguishing forest fires and it provides three kinds of damage. The lecturer, nevertheless, explains that burning is the natural part of ecological and it is a creative agent.
First, the reading claims that Yellowstone fired caused huge damage to the park's trees and vegetation. Conversely, the lecturer opposes this point by saying that it causes to have new vegetation and plants that are diverse in the park. The professor contends that the new plants start to appear after a fire.
In addition, the article posits that the wildlife was affected too. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that this also is creative about providing a new opportunity for animals. According to the professor, small animals start to replace trees that produce new habitat and foods that are stronger before a fire.
Finally, the passage expresses that by decreasing the value of park as a tourist attraction, the local economy will have a negative result. Quite on the contrary, the lecturer emphasizes that this result happens, if burning happen every year and that is not true.
Thus, the professor disproves each of the author's kinds of damage
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-25 | Apolytos | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, if, nevertheless, so, thus, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10849056604 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59796915921 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589622641509 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6357381102 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4545454545 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328266791251 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105532318115 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863321580872 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148805105766 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851622609571 0.0443174109184 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.