Studies suggested that nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? What measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things?
In the present, children is more and more passive than in the past as depending too much on technology. As the impact of technology development developed, televisions are familiar with kids accidentally. Hence, Children today spend much time on watching television instead of going outside. This phenomenon affects on children's development process completely and it should be solved as soon as possible.
According to this case, nowadays people are way wealthier than in the past. Actually, in the past, watching television was a luxury entertainment because of the high price. Thus, people could not afford to buy and only a few family had television in the neighborhood. However, nowadays, television is more popular due to the fact that most of families have at least one television. The second reason is that there are more channels for kids particularly. For example, Disney Channel is famous one, especially for under 18 year-old youth. In fact, on this channel, kids are able to watch every time because all programs are suitable for them like cartoons, movies, game shows.
To tackle this issue, a good idea is for the parents to organize daily activities of children by a schedule. Specifically, kids need to spend time on outdoor activity and studying equally and spend less time on watching television. Another solution is education which is important affection. For instance, the subjects should be combined the theory with creative things. Moreover, students certainly improve their thinking outside the box and being attracted on studying.
In conclusion, Children should not spend much time on watching television while they should do activities.
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in 3 different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- the bar graph 11
- the diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth 78
- Some people believe that population explosion is not a serious problem because the world has enough resources to support this issue. 61
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun family seems to be countable; consider using: 'few families'.
Suggestion: few families
...ople could not afford to buy and only a few family had television in the neighborhood. How...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the families') or simply say ''most families''.
Suggestion: most of the families; most families
...on is more popular due to the fact that most of families have at least one television. The secon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd time on outdoor activity and studying equally and spend less time on watching ...
^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vision while they should do activities.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, while, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32196969697 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86679869883 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617424242424 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.2137854202 49.4020404114 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.6470588235 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398050682474 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112428016525 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104163981865 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258684092291 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080390093885 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.