TPO41
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the dawn of civilization, education has often played a prominent role in all human societies. Dou to its paramount role, teachers have been considered as a valuable group in every society. But some people hold a view that nowadays instructures are not appreciated by others in contrast to the past. However, some other take an opposite view and believe that teachers now are more valued that before. I personally agree with the former view. In the following paragraphs, I will collaborate on my perspective.
The first significant reason to be mentioned is that there are a variety of educational facilities today. Advanced technology like the Internet obviously provides a huge information and everybody easily can access to them. I can remember when I was a child, I had a lot of questions about the creation of the world , different infectious diseases, solar system and so on. I could just ask my questions from my teachers in the school, my parents, or books borrowing from a small library next to my building house. Now every student in the school easily can access the Internet and search every information in the scientific websites. Some of this website like Wikipedia have a better knowledge than current teachers in the school and believe me even professors in the universities. As a result, the students know their teacher always are not the best reference of information.
Another equally important reason is that computer and communication technology provide some interesting careers that cause a huge income for people. According to a recent survey conducted by Harvard University, most increased income jobs are depended to computer studies such as programming, analyzing data and computer engineering. These increase salary changed the perspective of people about traditional works such as teaching in the schools or even higher educational system, universities. Today parents advice their children to choose study fields related to increased income jobs such as computer engineering.
All in all, teachers are one of the most important parts of every human society. But in my view, they have fewer values than the past due to advanced technology. Everyone easily can access to information and like jobs with a higher income.
- TPO 36 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:In order to become financially responsible adults, chilren should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 70
- TPO 4 3
- TPO 35Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO41Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 314, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...uestions about the creation of the world , different infectious diseases, solar sy...
^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to study'
Suggestion: to study
...parents advice their children to choose study fields related to increased income jobs...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, in contrast, such as, as a result, in contrast to, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20110192837 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93399905262 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4050868332 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.15 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104063422623 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339663598614 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368939557439 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705158978523 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460743637452 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.