Tpo28
Both the reading and lecture are about Robert E. Peary who traveled to reach the North Pole in 1909; however, there are a lot of negative views toward the valid of this issue. The reading provides three reasons to advocate this trip. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all reasons dubious due to the lack of solid evidence.
First of all, the author of reading contends that National Geographic commended a committee to survey Peary's equipment and records and finally the result was positive. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She declares that since National Geographic supported Peary with a big fund and as a matter a fact this institution and Peary were close friends; consequently, their results were biased and far away from objective. The professor elaborates on this by mentioning that the investigations just lasted two days; hence, they could not have worked accurately.
Secondly, the article states that this story that Peary could arrive to North Pole in 37 days, was tested by an explorer who was called Tom Avery. He applied to the same route with the same type of dogsled and even with the same number of doges and again the conclusions was exact and reliable. This argument is rebutted by the professor. The lecturer points out that the weight of equipment of Avery were much less than Peary because Avery's food carried by airplane. Moreover, the condition of climate in Avery's time had big difference with Peary's time; subsequently, this comparison is not convincing.
Finally, the reading passage argues that there are some photos which their shadow have been investigated and measured by researchers. This conclusion could be drawn that shadow of photos corresponds with sun's position in The North Pole. On the other hand, the professor refutes this suggestion. She expresses that these photos have taken in one hundred years ago with primitive camera which may have created fuzzy images, so during time, their shadow can be blurred or disappeared.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-25 | Hamide | 70 | view |
| 2020-02-08 | zizi.dream | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | crystal80314 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | DAISY CHANG | 71 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | ememari | 75 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The telephone has greater influence on people’s lives than television has. 86
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 85
- do you agree or disagree? should do students do miscellaneous things during the study as navigating on internet, listening to the music and reading book and so on, or it can hurt to their study? 73
- do you agree or disagree?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all reasons dubious due...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05357142857 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55300248962 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 145.348785872 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.5201027528 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372058589639 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954245825457 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769084754458 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203790866993 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492787009102 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.