Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
A university is an institution where greater knowledge is imparted, taking over from high school. It is also a place which opens the gates to a bright career and a successful future, especially when the student excels in his or her desired field of interest. While this is considered as the ideal belief, the reality is far from it - colleges and universities have become black holes, which engulf the students in the trap of studying subjects that are irrelevant for their field of study. Thus, universities should not require students to take up a variety of courses outside their field of study.
Consider this - what purpose will Medieval Literature and Accounting serve for a student who wishes to aspire a future in Chemical Engineering? Rather than learning about Shakespeare and Balance Sheets, it would be practically wise for the student to spend more of his/her time in learning the empirical formulas of Toulene and it’s practical applications. This will also help the student towards saving quite a lot of money, which he/she would otherwise have spent on those irrelevant subjects. With an increase in the amount of time dedicated towards the relevant subjects, the students will be greatly driven to contribute in their respective fields of study, be it research-wise or application-wise.
At the same time, some of the students are unsure which fields of study they want to pursue when they enter college. Thus, they should be given the freedom to learn a variety of subjects, before they can zero in on a particular field of study.
To conclude, forcing students to take up extra and irrelevant subjects can not only prove to be a costly and time-consuming ritual, but can also lead to the students losing focus and inspiration. This is why they should not be required to take up courses outside their field of study.
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 58
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rat 66
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...application-wise. At the same time, some of the students are unsure which fields of stu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, thus, while, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99675324675 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80396812622 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.039802886 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08333333333 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290912654046 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122413620476 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821758334978 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183765389454 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662577751347 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.