Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends. This has had a negative effect on their social lives.
What extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Electronic messaging and email have changed our social lives and the way we communicate with our friends. However, it is not at all certain that our social lives are worse as a result. In many ways, they are better.
In the past, people communicated by letter or by phone. They used to meet and see each other only when they had time. Because people led busy lives, often they did not have any communication with some of their friends for months. As a consequence, their relationship suffered.
Nowadays, we can be in constant contact with all our friends using social website and instant messa...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-23 | zanny | 61 | view |
| 2018-01-28 | candymahone | 10 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Ha Phan Ngoc Quan | 84 | view |
| 2016-09-20 | jimpan | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Ha Phan Ngoc Quan | 84 | view |
- The diagrams on the right shows two types of building design that help reduce the effects of earthquakes. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.-Syerapke- (rewrite) 65
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 55
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000. 90
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 69
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 67
I disagree entirely statement in the question
I disagree entirely the statement in the question
flaws:
No. of Words: 261 350
No. of Different Words: 147 200
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.312 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 261 350
No. of Characters: 1213 1500
No. of Different Words: 147 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.019 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.648 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.522 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 79 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 54 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 34 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.312 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.252 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.312 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.326 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.567 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5