People now can better protect the environment than they could in the past. do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is no doubt that the environment is in trouble. In fact, all around us, all living thing which comprised balanced ecosystem are being systematically destroyed by human greed and thoughtlessness, but in the past, there was a balanced between the ecosystem and humans demands. I think, today, people cannot protect the environment than the past.
In the past, the people had the simple life style, but these days, modern technology has changed people’s life style and needing to material has been increased. Certainly, producing new materials can lead to destruction the environment. Factories burn fossil fuels which produce acid rain and this kills trees. At the same time, greenhouses gasses emit into the air and contribute to global warming which causes the polar ice cap to thaw. Meanwhile farmers clear huge area in places such as the Amazon to produce feeding land for cattle or produce wood for building. Rivers and oceans are contaminated heavily by industrial waste. Cars pump out poisonous emissions which we all have to breathe in. poaching and overfishing are killing off millions of animals, including whales, elephants and other endangered species. Also, relying heavily on the environment and using natural resources to support industries can deprive local population from their natural rights to use these resources.
On the other hand, more and more homes and industrial areas are being built as population increase and these need efficient water delivery services, hygienic sewage disposal systems and etc. if providing these services is not planned, it will be caused environmental destruction.
In my opinion, however, many factors should be taken into consideration to solve environment problems, but the role of the people is incredible. It is everybody’s responsibility to make every effort to protect the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-20 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-12 | fmichela | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | nida fatima | 70 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | raspberry_momo | 90 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | toriettttt | 84 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Educating children is a more difficult task today that it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web sites. Use specific reasons and example 76
- young people do not give enough time to helping their communities.do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 78
- People now can better protect the environment than they could in the past do you agree or disagree 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... protect the environment than the past. In the past, the people had the simple l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...which causes the polar ice cap to thaw. Meanwhile farmers clear huge area in places such ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...vices, hygienic sewage disposal systems and etc. if providing these services is not plan...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, i think, in fact, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 291.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45704467354 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95576597067 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.683848797251 0.524837075471 130% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6575381362 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13496729529 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454112424591 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765936565103 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795565260852 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563800979642 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.