advantages of cars?
In the wake of social development, a burgeoning population of cars triggers concern worldwide. In this regard, whether the advantages of cars outstrip those drawbacks is a controversial issue. While many people assert that this would be a detrimental effect, I, however, stand for the opposite idea.
Profoundly, it is irrefutable that, cars give people freedom in movement with affordable petrol price and narrow duration of travelling. Firstly, these automobiles would wipe out the time and distance barriers. To illustrate, people no longer have to stick with the constant time schedule of buses or planes; by contrast, with their personal cars, they could voyage whenever and wherever they want. Also, cars have also become an article in dress that demonstrate people status and their taste in fashion. That is to say, cars to individuals do more good than harm
In larger scale, the automobile industry plays vital role influencing world economy. This, obviously, has been enhancing job opportunity for those engaging in car relevant firms such as filling station, drivers, which therefore reducing the unemployment rate. What is more, the local state could increase their government budget since cars owners have to pay for their taxes and insurance fees prediodically. Like Japan, a country has 38 percent contribution to economy from vehicles, most of developing countries are redirecting their major to automobiles.
However, cars still pose threats notwithstanding. They drive people to the trap of medical risk like respiratory-related diseases, obesity or brain damage.
In conclusion, from what have been mentioned, I strongly believe that despite the disadvantages, cars still stand out first priority for its merits. As a matter of course, we should raise awareness in using cars for both individuals and community. By doing so, we may deter the negative sides of mushrooming cars
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-17 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | nhub2409785 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | nhatkhang111 | 78 | view |
- 1.Some people say that the government should not put money on building theatres and sports stadiums. Other argues that they should spend more money on medical care and education. Discuss both view 89
- aaaaaaa 11
- advantages of cars? 89
- what is the advantage of improve living standard? 84
- the benefits of cars? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, may, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, of course, such as, what is more, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44594594595 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99241187893 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679054054054 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1411338813 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299347833036 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939366892987 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846591008902 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151602792443 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617526694387 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.