In some parts of the world it is increasingly popular to research the history of one's own family. Why do people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development?
In some areas we can catch sight of an increasing number of many people dig into the history of their own family. There are a mixed variety of reasons why they want to do this and in my point of view, it is a positive development no matter how many people argue this issue. This essay will first discuss the reasons for this action, then it will give evidence to explain why this is a positive development.
For me, there are two main reasons leading to this popular trend. Firstly, the people who want to do research on their family’s history are possibly curious about their ancestors. To be more specific, they would have the feeling of excitement to know more about their family roots as well as discover the secrets in millions years ago of their family. For example, my friends hope that he has a wealthy ancestor and even image that his ancestor would hide treasures somewhere for his descendants, so he burns the midnight oil to muse over the family trees. Secondly, with the help of Internet, people are easily inspired by their peers who share their discover about their forbears on Facebook and eventually they will start imitating their friends.
In terms of whether it is a positive or negative development, I reckon that it is a good one. Researching the family trees can be their interest, which helps them to let the tension melt away after a hard working day at the workplace. Furthermore, this way will help us to acquire more knowledge, which can be history lessons for us to teach our children and rekindles the interest to learn history for them. To give an example, many kids can not stand the history lessons delivered by their teachers, so listen to their parents’ story about family history would be a way more interesting way.
All in all, people are out of curiosity or follow the advertisements on the Internet to keep this trend growing. No matter how many people do this, this bring advantages to both the researcher and their children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-31 | meobeoulala | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 78
- The Early Bird Gets the Bad Grade 70
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The bar graph below shows the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, i reckon, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72910662824 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55678233887 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544668587896 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6974902701 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.214285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27231189969 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103618997542 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816376603741 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177323829773 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912353693015 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.