Do you think consumers should avoid purchase of over packaged products or it is the responsibility of producers to avoid extra packaging of products. Give your views with any relevant example of your own experience.
It is often believed that buyers should prevent patronizing over packed goods but others suggest that it is the duty of the manufacturers to avoid over-packaging of their products. In my perspective, it a wise decision to select environmentally-friendly items for the former and considering alternative available materials for the latter.
To begin with, citizens must ensure to support the advocacy of protecting mother earth by a simple means of the products they are consuming. This is particularly in regards to the packaging that most commodities nowadays are utilizing. Individuals should be more careful and practical in choosing products to purchase by evaluating the waste that can be generated from its packaging materials. In my own experience, I have observed that the packaging of mobile phone is over what is really needed, there are several divisions inside the box that uses different cartons for the accessories, but today it had lessened than the past few years.
Furthermore, the fact that producers have a vital role to eliminate these over packed products are in control of it. They should be the ones front-lining the change when it comes to reducing such waste generated from these packages. They must also look upon alternative materials that could still provide a finish product which is of high quality and could secure the item inside.
Overall, the consumers as well as the manufacturers have an equal responsibility in preserving the environment by being practical and to take full liability on ones actions and the consequences of it. Once and for all, it is a two-way relationship if people would not buy the product due to impractical packaging, the producer will find its way to reduce it and thereby saves significant resource and also less production of wastage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-23 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 88 | view |
| 2017-08-31 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 88 | view |
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management e 73
- ANY NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE RECENT YEARS IS A BOON OR CURSE FOR THE SOCIETY IN GENERAL 85
- While technology can provide benefits, it can also cause problems and challenges. Describe how technology affects you or someone you know. Include positive as well as negative effects. 11
- In many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion? 88
- In today s era TV has become very important part of life as a medium to spread intelligence and social awareness Do you think it could have other side as well 26
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...hey are consuming. This is particularly in regards to the packaging that most commodities now...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, really, so, still, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18835616438 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16047281025 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606164383562 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1535346461 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.727272727 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197632191505 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667560976703 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516580344116 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107368145097 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043683382909 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.