We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is usually possible to hear that we live in a greedy world where many people are ego-centered and care about their own needs only. Some believe that it is an impossible mission to help everyone on our huge planet: there are distance, money and time barriers. I completely disagree with this point of view. In my mind, there are some clear reasons which ensure that everyone deserves help and can get it from people all over the world. Moreover, it is profitable for both who helps and who needs help.
To begin with, undoubtely, the gap between countries and nationalities in terms of wealth, providing with natural resources and living conditions becomes more crucial each year. African inhabitants are lacked of water and food, while most remaining countries and continents are abundant in them. The equilibrium is possible to reach by providing help from “rich” regions to “poor” ones. Taking modern techonogies and up-to-date means of transport into account, this task is seems to be easily completed.
In addition, there is some evidence that all countries are interdependent. World financial crisis 2008 is a demonstrative proof for this thesis: financial crash steadily captured the whole world, although it began in the USA. Th same state of affairs may become actual in medical sphere or in war situations: crisis in one place will extend to the rest of the world. This way, it is crucial to give a helping hand to communities in need. Such actions can prevent irretrievable costs and losses.
To sum up, in my personal view, modern communities should be concerned not onle about their own deals but also about critical state of their “neighbours”. Such position is beneficial for both sides as it prevents unstoppable consequenses and makes world equilibrium achievable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-15 | tiendung00001 | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-15 | tiendung00001 | 61 | view |
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- The number of plants and animals is declining Describe the problem and suggest some solutions 57
- The role of prisons should be to punish criminals who have committed serious crimes. Training courses and education offered to prisoners are a waste of taxpayer’s money. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to help'
Suggestion: to help
...ons which ensure that everyone deserves help and can get it from people all over the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, moreover, so, while, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17966101695 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06831908651 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637288135593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0233789102 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262006811971 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073768003087 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587152508414 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139094196331 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769104565712 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.