You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The pie chart below shows the results of a survey of the causes of poor learning outcomes in schools in a particular country in 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The pie chart illustrates the reasons why unskillful learning came from schools in a country in 2011. The units are measured from the percentage.
Overall, it is clear that the untrained teachers had a significant impact on academic results, while the smallest proportion of unsatisfactory school results was the lack of revision.
When it comes to unskilled teachers, this factor was a contribution to 35%, which accounted for nearly one-third. The percentage of unskilled instructors and nurturing was 25 and 27 percent respectively. This was followed by the way a child is brought up, a cause quoted by 27% of the poll sample which is the second largest contribution. On the other hand, 20 percent of people regarded as one of the low educational attainments was could income families. This ratio was double compared with poor infrastructures, experienced by 10 percent. However, it is undoubtedly true that only 8 percent people blamed lack of revision for below academic results.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-10-09 | Ha su jeong | 42 | view |
- Write a report for university lecturer describing the information in the two graphs below 11
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The pie chart below shows the results of a survey of the causes of poor learning outcomes in schools in a particular country in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 42
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 77
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 91
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to in 2000 and 2010 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, third, while, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23270440252 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13803076076 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685534591195 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9344396174 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4444444444 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122299625293 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488782113178 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576373390819 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891254934064 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481365078037 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.