tpo 46
The lecture and the reading both discuss the method of medical information recorded. On the first hand the reading sates that records in electronic databases has several advantages. On the other hand, the lecture refutes this, by saying the argument mentioned in the passage does no significant true and they use it like an emergency back up.
First of all, the reading claims that electronic records can help reduce costs. However, the lecture argues that the doctors usually discontinue the recording use the electronic medical system, and they still using the pen and paper to write the patients records so they still pay for record cost.
In addition, the reading makes the argument is that one of it's benefites is preventing errors. The lecture counter this point by saying that the doctors still using the pen and paper then they still do the same mistakes on poor writing.
The reading passage argues that it is can greatly aid research. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that the doctors must folow a strict and complicated constructions make it private in the united states. Also, patients absolutly can make block the acces of their records.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-30 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | afgmar | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | yasamiamirreza | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 65, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...es that it is can greatly aid research. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, still, then, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 195.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03076923077 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44285645628 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339831821356 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129594634351 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11779253042 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198163197292 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153600087363 0.0443174109184 347% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.