Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not.
The substantial influence of extreme sports has sparked a controversy among the public around the globe. While specifically argument claim that adventurous activities are fun and exciting, a group of luminaries dispute otherwise and hold an opponent’s view. I am inclined highly to accept that adventurous sports might lead to serious adverse affects and long-term injuries. The agenda of this article is elaborations of both advantages and disadvantages of extreme activities, which clarifies how it impacts teenagers who like sports with a high level of adrenaline and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why adventurous actions such as mountain biking and jumping over the cliff are supported. The most conspicuous one lies in the fact that only a few number of brave people can do those activities. For instance, a recently undertaken study in Adelaide university has shown that 95% of people who commit sky divings are permanently employed by advertising companies. Hence, it can be clearly seen that adventurous actions are a kind of business.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of dangerous sports, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that extreme sports might lead to serious body-injuries. Moreover, it is strongly claimed that higher level of adrenaline might increase a response time in dangerous situations. From my own experience, when I was a teenager I broke my both legs when I was biking on the mountain. Therefore, the importance of adventurous sports and its detriments which might lead to an unrecoverable body injury could be seen with clarity.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, my sentiment is that the benefits of adventurous sports far outweigh its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-30 | Mpaul | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Simranjot7087 | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | mizomz123 | 55 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | rayudurp | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | jaideep singh | 88 | view |
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory.Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? 85
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Working and living abroad helps us to know other cultures well. How far you think working abroad has good or bad impacts on our cultural lives? 77
- Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact 85
- In an educational system, assessment through formal written examination still valid? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...icuous one lies in the fact that only a few number of brave people can do those activities...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dy in Adelaide university has shown that 95% of people who commit sky divings are...
^^
Line 6, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...my own experience, when I was a teenager I broke my both legs when I was biking o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3904109589 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12291213796 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599315068493 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7755744911 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.076923077 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0647836017989 0.242375264174 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0217019356388 0.0925447433944 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243262517271 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0330545899817 0.151781067708 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259231692197 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.