TPO 32 Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
Any society contains people of different age levels, all of them are concerned about the future of their country. Some people believe that nowadays young people do not have influence on the decisions that make the future of the society. In my way of thinking, youths have important rolls in the decisions of the country because not only do they are concerned about their country and next generations, but also they incorporate in any social activities that affect future plans.
The first reason that can be stated here is that young people are involved in plans that make the country future. They follow news on economy and political decisions of governments then if it is necessary they show reaction to them. For example, if governments make a wrong decision or anything that might be harmful to society, the young people will exhibit reaction and force political men to change their mind. It can be expanded to economy and other aspects of the community. In addition, young people care about their next generation, and they are cautious about activities that will make problems for future people. For instance, there are many groups that are working on global warming and dangerous pollutions that are produced by foul. This shows they are worried about future people and want to make a better world for next generations.
The other reason that deserves some words is that youths have impressive incorporate in social activities. In any place and any time that is needed young people will take apart and try to do their best to make a better future for their country. These activities contain revolutionary works for making huge changes in the economy or other parts of society, or arbitrary activities to enhance one part of community like agriculture, technology, since, and so on. In such mentioned activities, young people always have impressive roll since they want better future. As an example, consider a country that has suitable fields and land for agriculture; the politician decisions to use them to improve society farming. In one community activity, all young people will corporate and farm in those lands to planting trees. These trees can be used for many years and produce needs of society that result in the independence of society from other countries.
To summarize, today young people have important effects on decisions that make future of their society; it is clear because they are concerned for future of their community and they interfere in any decisions that governments make. In addition, they will do any volunteer activities to help their society to have better prospects. Who do you think is disagree with this theses?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mohammad9090 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | fafar | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Seema Modak | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Biz Biz | 80 | view |
- TPO 48 68
- TPO 32 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 70
- TPO 40 83
- tpo 39. integrated 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 366, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ects. Who do you think is disagree with this theses?
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2224.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04308390023 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57624914582 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451247165533 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3796263655 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.05 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249092686007 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879541818647 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793949610438 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191048344155 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566099579094 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.