The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning more than one language and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that learning various languages is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a noticeable number of individuals. I am strongly inclined to believe that being bilingual can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the linguistic standpoint, learning an official language can provide the society with some undeniable effects which are rooted in the fact that globalization, as well as different civilizations, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered more job opportunities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both cognitive skills and the vernacular distinctly can be seen.
Within the realm of conversational science, speaking a dead language might increase the consequences of culture shock. Moreover, detrimental aspects of knowing a dominant language and the ability to speak a lingua franca relate to this reality that the demerits of native language pertain to the power of expression. As a tangible instance, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that efficient experiences are correlated negatively with mingling with people. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of broadening our horizons.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of language learning far outweigh its drawbacks. The advantages of Native language not only prove the significance of widely used around the world, but also pinpoint career implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Fernanda Giorge | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Mahdi_Farhani | 80 | view |
- polygamy 11
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support or not? 88
- Parents are responsible for their children s behavior To what extent do you agree or disagree 97
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71212121212 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28176361912 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2876091178 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203862882978 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638104645084 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567773870741 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111595429048 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666371623724 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.