Law changes human behavior.
The importance of law in changing human’s behavior, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of enforcement of stringent rules has sparked the controversy over the potential impacts of this trend in recent years. I am inclined highly to believe that law plays a significant role in shaping individual’s conducts. This essay will elaborate how imposing strict rules could affect people’s actions before a reasonable conclusion is drawn.
At the outset, there are numerous ways how enforceable principles contribute significantly to persons’ behaviors, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that existence of law creates a sense of fear among people of getting punished. For instance, based on an interview conducted in Australia in 2015, more than 80 percent of citizens involved in prime minister voting because of the existence of strict rules within Australia. Therefore, law plays an effective deterrent to not following regulations within societies.
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that enforceable principles keep countries and societies in an order and harmony. Although laws are not able to change people’s potential, they play a leading role in standardizing their habits. From my own experience, when I was in university fastening my seatbelt saved my life during driving many times. Hence, the ramifications of law could be seen with clarity.
After a plenty of thoughts and deliberations with myself, I have come to the conclusion that law can change human’s behavior by both standardizing of their habits as well as creation of fears among them of getting punished
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | bradkina | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | bradkina | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Ekta shah | 62 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | Nainajovitta | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | Nainajovitta | 55 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- The Ability to communicate in more than one language will be less important in the future than it is now.” Do you Agree or disagree with this statement? Provide Support for your opinion. 85
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...r by both standardizing of their habits as well as creation of fears among them of getting...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53281853282 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27312033639 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667953667954 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8887721754 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.416666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27609664006 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984998856789 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125516677889 0.071462118173 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172372137799 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087941520563 0.0609392437508 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.