TPO-45 Integrated Writing Task
The author of the reading passage and the professor both discuss whether the bees existed for 200 million years ago due to the unearthed fossil structures which are discovered in Arizona. The author is against the idea and raises three viewpoints. However, the professor indicates that the author’s theories contain some defects.
First of all, the author claims that the earliest fossils can be found is 100 million years ago, there is no genuine bees’ body ever be found can be traced back to 200 million years ago. In the contrary, the professor disagrees. Even though the fact is true, there is another explanation for this occurrence. There are some trees which produce the sticky liquid, resin, could be able to preserve the structures of bees. These kinds of trees are rarely back to 200 million years ago. Therefore, bees may exist in 200 million years ago, but there were no trees released resin to preserve the nest.
In addition, the author states that according to the biological relationship which is observed nowadays between the bees and the flowering plants are connected very closely. In 200 million years ago, there are not much of flowering plants back then. On the contrary, the professor questions the idea by saying that early bees don't feed on the flowering plants by instead feeding on the non-flowering trees such as pine trees. Indeed, they may adopt the flowering plants after they started sprouting.
Finally, the author raises the point that the real nest chambers have caps, but the fossilized structures don’t have ones. As a result, the professor contends that there is chemical evidence can prove the fossilized structures are made by bees. The bees use the waterproof substance to protect their nest from the water. After the chemical analysis of the fossilized structures, it is discovered that they have these waterproof materials too. Turn out, these fossils are related to the bees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-12 | M.S 2019 | 60 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | pezhmanlamei | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | Shayooooon | 3 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2018-11-09 | tarannomkhak | 3 | view |
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 78
- 137) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? High schools should allow students to study the courses that students want to study. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 61
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 63
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 70
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ions the idea by saying that early bees dont feed on the flowering plants by instead...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, may, so, then, therefore, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09717868339 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54111540844 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495297805643 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0521447013 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.074143807496 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0253710356986 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264475152418 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0436805651801 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202949385886 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.