Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Today, governemnts focus on improving quality of life that would bring a lot of benefits for citizens such as communication, transportation, health care... Some people believe that governemts should build more railroads rather than highways or roads. In my opinion, I agree with the statement. There are some reasons for this idea.
On the one hand, It can reduced pollution when more people drives to work in weekday. Nowadays, people spend a lot of time on the roads in rush hours. At the same time, emissions of cars bring more pollution in our environment. Besides, if people got into traffic jam for a long time, they easily get upset. Furthermore, researchs show that it is get more pollution of air that cars stopped on the roads without cutting power. Therefore, trainstation is a good way that never could get into congestion and train is a public transport which is more useful to reduce air pollution.
In addition, It is undeniable that the number of car is growing in recently years. This caused traffic jam have being horrible problem. So, building more railways is a good way which could solved congestion on the road to make people commute by train. For example, as Singapore has a very good train network called MRT, most of people rarely drive on their own vehicle. As a result, Singapore is free from traffic congestion and air pollution. Furthermore, the train will take more people to go to their destinations without waiting on the road in peak hours. Finally, public transport is cheaper than privatcal vehicle, people could save money to do others they interested.
In conclusion, governments should pay more money for building railways. It bring more advantages than drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- The flowchart below the recycling process of aluminium cans 66
- The chart show the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 59
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestations 69
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 25, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...for this idea. On the one hand, It can reduced pollution when more people drives to wo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...s a very good train network called MRT, most of people rarely drive on their own vehicle. As a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'brings'?
Suggestion: brings
...ay more money for building railways. It bring more advantages than drawbacks.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, furthermore, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98596491228 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74126947337 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1580974773 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.7894736842 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117953226217 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426799502756 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583186659887 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913951409246 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578992624159 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.