Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Due to the complexity of educational apparatus, educators are put under pressure to plan a curriculum that best address all the knowledge and skills required while accommodating the interests from the students. From my perspective, interests should be part of the consideration as it acts as catalyst motivating students in their learning. However, educators might need to be cautious in adopting suggestions from students as they are not always reliable and accountable in various respects.
Educator should consider the interests of students as they act as relentless impetus propelling students forwards with their academic and professional performance. Admittedly, in classroom setting, one of the mission embraced by educators should be the potent to capture the attention of the students. In order to achieve this goal, many teachers have adopted various creative teaching methods by incorporating students interests and desire into the scheme. For instance, students are more responsive towards media and digital means, thus, audio-visual medians are considered effectual in improving the overall teaching quality.
However, implementing the proposed strategy might impose challenges to fulfill the diverse interests and propositions from the students. There is immeasurable amount of variables to be taken into account when planning courses for students. Primarily, the syllabus should be deemed appropriate to cater to the need of the majority. Since not all students share the same interest or learning capability, it is likely to take up a lot of time and effort to try to plan the course in accordance to all requests proposed by students. Likewise, it is also unfair to adopt some while abandon others. Thus, ‘majority rules’is considered the most ideal approach in this case.
‘Educators’of different stages in the academic cycle should consider this policy diligently as the situations vary from time to time. Given that the students in primary and secondary education are much less mature, the duty of teachers in such institutes should take more control on how the curriculum should be shaped instead of following suggestions from students. On the contrary, college students should be bestowed some latitudes to propose suggestion that could potentially alleviate their learning environment and teaching quality.
In conclusion, interests should be taken into account while planning curriculum, yet educators should also be aware on the boundary of adoption. Likewise, educators have to be even more meticulous about filtering advices given by students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-02 | bmartinurcelay | 58 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | 08sandip | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Navis | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- The best way to teach—whether as an educator, employer, or parent—is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your 83
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 62
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 89
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 75
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
...rom my perspective, interests should be part of the consideration as it acts as cata...
^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fulfilling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: fulfilling
...oposed strategy might impose challenges to fulfill the diverse interests and propositions ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 678, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the most ideal approach in this case. 'Educators'of different stages...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, second, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69665809769 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13224068806 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53470437018 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8733094711 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.111111111 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327130242332 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101702061353 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606978170144 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1913437635 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263237993928 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.