The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Country Food/drinks/tobacco Clothing/ footwear Leisure/education
Ireland 28.91% 6.43% 2.21%
Italy 16.36% 9.00% 3.20%
Spain 18.80% 6.51% 1.98%
Sweden 15.77% 5.40% 3.22%
Turkey 32.14% 6.63% 4.35%
The graph compares percentages of consumer expenditure of five separate countries around the world, namely, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey in terms of three categories which are in services and products industry in 2002.
It is noticeable that Food/ drinks/ tobacco had the largest proportion of consumer spending in five countries, but leisure/ education category had the lowest percentages in the table. Overall, the consumer expenditure were quite different in five countries.
Looking more closely at the graph, we can see that Turkey ( 32.14%), and Ireland ( nearly 29%) have higher percentage in food/drinks/tobacco than in any of the other countries. The spending on leisure/education was highest in Turkey, at 4.35%, while expenditure on Clothing/Footwear was significant high in Italy, at 9%.
Sweden has lowest percentage in Food/ drinks/ tobacco and Clothing/Footwear , at around 16% and 5.5% respectively. Spain has tip over higher figures for these categories , but the lowest figure for leisure/education, at only 1.98%
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.CountryFood/drinks/tobaccoClothing/ footwearLeisure/educationIreland28.91% 6.43%2.21%Italy 16.36% 78
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. Given time, technologywill completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree with thisstatement? 61
- the diagram shows how plate glass and bottle glass are made 89
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee. 78
- Some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them. Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ervices and products industry in 2002. It is noticeable that Food/ drinks/ toba...
^^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely at the graph, we can see that Turkey 32.14%, and Ireland nearly 29% have hig...
^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can see that Turkey 32.14%, and Ireland nearly 29% have higher percentage in foo...
^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the lowest'.
Suggestion: has the lowest
...ificant high in Italy, at 9%. Sweden has lowest percentage in Food/ drinks/ tobacco an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...west percentage in Food/ drinks/ tobacco and Clothing/Footwear , at around 16% an...
^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.../ drinks/ tobacco and Clothing/Footwear , at around 16% and 5.5% respectively. Sp...
^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...over higher figures for these categories , but the lowest figure for leisure/educa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71794871795 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47958543814 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628205128205 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5735293663 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.428571429 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120809480505 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663154902417 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541919565508 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798017803085 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546810870678 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.4140731707 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.