Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. Given time, technology
will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree with this
statement?
In today’s world, the use of technology is ever-increasing. Even in classrooms technology
can be commonly seen. It is disagreed that technology will completely replace the teacher in the
classroom. Analyzing both the inability of a technology-driven teacher to discipline students in a
classroom as well as this robotic teacher’s hindrance to a student’s learning process will show
this.
Firstly, a teacher powered by artificial intelligence would have little to no control over its
students. For example, it is commonly understood that children require the watchful eye of a
teacher to ensure that they are indeed completing their class work and not fooling around during
class time. Unfortunately this is something that a robotic teacher simply cannot provide. Thus
this makes it clear why technology will never completely replace the teacher in the classroom.
Secondly, a robotic teacher would disrupt a student’s learning process and in effect slow a
student’s ability to absorb information from lessons. For instance, kids require motivation to be
taught effectively. Such is a quality human teachers possess but technologically driven instructor
do not. From this it becomes quite evident that robotic instructors will never take the place of
real teachers in a classroom.
In summary, a robotic teacher lacks the discipline needed to instruct students properly and
actually operates to retard a student’s ability to learn new information. Thus it is clear why the
idea of having a class run entirely by a machine cannot be supported. After analyzing this
subject, it is predicted that the negative aspects of the debate over computerized teaching will
forever be stronger than the positive ones and because of this computers will never replace
teachers.
- Some people think that video games are advantageous, while others believe video games are harmful to the people who play them. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- the diagram shows how plate glass and bottle glass are made 89
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. Given time, technologywill completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree with thisstatement? 61
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and dis advantages for young people who decide to do this. 73
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom.Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... to discipline students in a classroom as well as this robotic teacher's hindrance t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... robotic teacher simply cannot provide. Thus this makes it clear why technology wil...
^^^^
Line 13, column 45, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'teacher'?
Suggestion: teacher
...ht effectively. Such is a quality human teachers possess but technologically driven inst...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 80, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...pos;s ability to learn new information. Thus it is clear why the idea of having a c...
^^^^
Line 20, column 59, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...r than the positive ones and because of this computers will never replace teachers....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in summary, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63043478261 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26650881143 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1837903459 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 19.0 4.38176352705 434% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211462163176 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919537295874 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949323705914 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768011152576 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748672770118 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.