Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Country consists of towns as well as villages. In order to develop the country, it is needed to develop both city and urbane areas. I disagree with the statement that country will developed through city. Definitely, city contains different types of the cultures, languages, customs, and varieties: large proportion of the population live in the facilities cities. I fell this way for some major reasons: to develop easily, to control the revolution, and make harmonious.
First of all, government has equal opinion towards their all citizens. If government want to emphasizes to their cities population, it becomes cynical; Which brings slow development in the infrastructure. Major cultures are centralized on the high mass areas; however, some special cultures: very old and primitive, still away from the cities. For instance, Raute--endangered caste, they lived in forest and eat wild animals only--they do not want to come cities, don't like luxury. At this situation, how government preserved their culture to provide fund to the major cities?
Secondly, to remove the revolt from the public equality is needed for all parts of country. Good research is needed to take the actual data and make the policy to stimulus the preserve the culture. Modern cities are following the modern custom. They forgot their tradition gradually. Hence, fund is totally wasted. In order to save the primitive tradition, it is needed to provide fund equally to all parts of country.
Finally, to generate the tradition proper education is fruitful. For example, in our country, to generate the tradition; our government make one council, council members from the whole country. They actively worked together and collect the actual data, the outcomes of the project is that old tradition is situated at the very urbane regions. Hence, we can say that to preserve the tradition, equal emphasizes is appropriate.
To recapitulate, government should be scrupulous, it is better to provide the fund equally towards the whole parts of the country. Which brings the halcyon and harmonious environment in the country.
- The human mind is superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 50
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves. 50
- Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to widen the highway adding an additional lane of traffic But last 30
- people choose same course of study 16
- " we can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own".;disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning". 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'emphasize'.
Suggestion: emphasize
...eir all citizens. If government want to emphasizes to their cities population, it becomes ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 464, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... only--they do not want to come cities, dont like luxury. At this situation, how gov...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, for instance, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 333.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30630630631 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83132704031 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546546546547 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9716219072 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3181818182 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1363636364 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217538646021 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622098604672 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612795460636 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110805974779 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662418190906 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.