A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how those examples shape your position.
Education is one important aspect of life that everyone have come to embrace. With the increasing trend of technology growth and the invention of new ways to do things has made education inevitable. Ignorance can land people in doom and literacy is the mark of the day. We all have come to acknowledge the sophistication of our lives now and the improvement in diverse ways - transportation, research, health, food; just to mention a few. Requiring a nation to teach students the same curriculum in the national level seems very cogent but I do not fully agree to this assertion.
First of all, the fact that no two individuals are same is a reason enough to consider other matters. The diversity of interests of students can be considered. Instances where one student has interest in music will mean that the needed knowledge will have to differ from another that has interest in soccer or any other sport for that matter. In mathematics, not all the topics thought are used in everyday life so a scenario like that will call for seiving the curriculum to teach the most relevant topics that suit the student and the career ahead of him or her.
Also, different interest means different career prospect and different future. If a student entering college is required to know certain subject materials prior to the course the student is going to read, why then don't we start from the foundation to better build the knowledge and understanding of that student. Kids that marvel us at tender ages doing what they love perfectly amaze us but that is because they start early and make geniuses out of themselves. They tap into where their interest lie and become somewhat obsessed but at the long run making them experts. I have seen kids memorize maps and others rack their brains to solve arithmetic problems without calculators. This tells you kids like that need different attentions.
Additionally, waiting until college might be too late for students to realize their interests and make the right choices. Currently, in many countries, segregation of study courses are made in high school which is good but can be made better if it is done earlier. However, one may argue that the needed knowledge of a country is mostly rudimentary. Everybody needs to be thought English and an additional international language to interact with others, everybody needs to be thought algebra and arithmetic to do various basic calculations and the like.
The things people view to be common knowledge can be thought as general subjects; perhaps until fifth grade. Then the segregation due to interest will be made and the curriculum continues. Aside that even through out the earlier stages, vocational or practical subjects can be thought such as basketry, intense history, art and painting and the like to engage the interest of the young students whiles teachers and parents discover the interest of wards.
I do not fully agree to the assertion because there is always a better way to do things that are viewed traditional. The different interests of students can be considered.
- “Because people increasingly eat at restaurants, all restaurants should be required to display nutritional information about the meals they serve. This knowledge makes it easier for diners to make healthy choices and reduces the risk of diet-related hea 26
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of the Juniper Café, a small, local coffee shop in the downtown area of a small American city:“We must reduce overhead here at the café. Instead of opening at 6 a.m. weekdays, we will now open at 8 50
- We venerate loyalty – to our schools, employers, institutions, friends – as a virtue. Loyalty, however can be at least as detrimental an influence as it can be a beneficial one. 50
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village r 66
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village r 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... the student is going to read, why then dont we start from the foundation to better ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 697, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[4]
Message: The pronoun 'you' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'kid'
Suggestion: kid
...ems without calculators. This tells you kids like that need different attentions. ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 206, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...e curriculum continues. Aside that even through out the earlier stages, vocational or pract...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2561.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96317829457 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71794913696 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531007751938 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 797.4 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7102436507 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.708333333 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08333333333 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147654784102 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393778804804 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448796289045 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712909150298 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305451172585 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.