Should age discrimination against older workers be made illegal?
Recently, the phenomenon of discrimination of age and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that this type of decisions is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that N can be a plus, and I will analyze it throughout this essay. From the sociological standpoint, some old people can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the experience, as well as their intensive knowledge, are inextricably bound up. According my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which dicovered some efficiency in the work environment. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both fairness and legal discriminate issue apparently can be seen. Within the realm of psychological science, youth might increase the consequence of accuracy. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of advertising relate to reality that the demerits of inexperienced work force pertain to lack of ideal labour. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of bad employee is correlated negatively with their age. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this problem. To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of age discrimination far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of aging prove the significance of it, but also pinpoint the good work force implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-25 | minhaz | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-02 | uzamak | 55 | view |
| 2018-01-12 | amin_mostafavi | 88 | view |
| 2018-01-12 | amin_mostafavi | 55 | view |
| 2017-06-27 | tushartawanee | 93 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.484 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34929007403 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.74218157 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110606971659 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388302678622 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442178597803 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110606971659 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.