The chart below shows the waste disposal in 1 European country in four years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008.
The bar chart illustrates the average amount of waste disposed of in one European country in terms of landfill, burning and dumping at sea.
Overall, the amount of waste disposed to landfill decreased dramatically in four years period, whereas there was a gradual increase in the figure for burning.
In 2005, 1800 million tonnes was the amount of rubbish went into landfill, while the quantity of waste incinerated and waste dumped at sea were just 500 and 600 respectively. However, there was a sharp decline in the amount of rubbish disposed to landfill, with one- third amount of rubbish in 2005. At the same time, the amount of waste went into landfill was surpassed by that of waste burned.
The quantity of waste incinerated was just 500 million tonnes in 2005; however, it rose steadily and reached its peak in 2008 with 900 million tonnes. In contrast, waste dumped at sea witnessed a fluctuation from exactly 600 million tonnes in 2005, followed by over 600 million tonnes in 2007 before a decline to 500 million tonnes in 2008
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- More and more people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries Why young people choose to do so Who will benefit more young people or the communities 85
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 73
- The graph below compare changes in the birth rates of China and the US between 1920 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisions where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89325842697 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50940032954 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483146067416 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8762313104 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.428571429 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228479299945 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11629921258 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465937136047 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150441787738 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393773415833 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.