tpo 40
In the reading passage, the author claims that there are three viable explanations that demonstrate Venus, as a permanent living place for human, is infeasible idea. However, finding all the points implausible and questionable, the professor castdoubt on what is presneted in the text and states that instead of lving on a surface of Venus, 15 kilometers uper its atmosphere will alleviate the problems mentioned in the reading considerably.
At first, the author argues thatthe high presuure at the Venus' surface hinder human to survive. Conversely, the lecturer contend that this problem occures if human land on the lower lattitude and surface of Venus. In fact, in 15 kilometers above this surface, the pressure is equal with the pressur of the earth. Therefore, the human were able to easily contunie his survive in this location.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that absent of water reservior is anothr dorable deficency regarding living on Venus. On the other hand, the professor dismisses this idea by clarifying the fact that the elements constituting the Venus atmosphere can be utilized to produce water. Therefore, regardless of lack of water in this planet, it is absolutely possible to have water, which is produces by the atmosphere components such as carbon dioxide and nitrogen, and there is no need to import it from the earth.
Finally, the author asserts that thick clouds of the Venus impede reaching adequate sunlight to the surface of Venus. The professor, though, disputes this point by subscribing the fact that establishing the station above the surface of Venus will eliminate this obstacle. Indeed, having constrcucted the station 15 kilometers up the surface, they not only recieve sufficient sunlight without such dense clouds but also can use the solar energy reflected from the clouds. Consequently, the equipements and machines will possess enough electricity power to work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-21 | PRACHI DAVE | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28013029316 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76386236291 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57654723127 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4008267177 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.692307692 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348357096794 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118550291084 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504694048308 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199872514022 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564533754477 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.