Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer

Since the dawn of civilization, human being's lives have changed enormously since they inherently have a tendency to improve their lives. Although some people believe that it is a waste of money for government to explore space, others exactly hold an opposite perspective. In no way could I agree with the latter point. There are some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.

To begin with, people who are living on the earth have serious problem relating to their environment including cutting forest, green house effect, polluted air. Hence, it is an obligatory task for government to find a great solution to solve these problem before exploring other spaces. As far as I know there is no life quality on other spaces for people, for this reason, it is really waste of money for government. Last week, I was reading a medicine magazine. the author said that there are a great deal of mental and physical diseases deriving from bad quality of environment. Consequently, government should consume their money on improving people's living area instead of other spaces.

Another reason which worth mentioning here is spending money on some unpredictable catastrophic events such as earthquake, hurricane. There is no doubt if one of them occurs, it is able to threat people's lives drastically. Since my major is earthquake engineering, I aware of a lot of issues relating to this problem. For example, If people be aware of the occurring time of earthquake, they can save their lives easily. According to scientific documents, if the warning time be 2 minutes, notice that just 2 minutes, 80% of people are able to save their lives easily. As a result, it is better for government consume their money on this phenomena to guarantee people's life which is their basic duty.
To make a long story short, Although government should try to find what is happening in our universe, they should their country problem before everything. Not only are they able to help people to experience better lives, but also they can make our earth a better place to live. For this reason, I highly recommend that government establishes some institutes to find our problem, if they have extra money after solving all problems, they can go beyond the earth to explore.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-15 hamiddelbari 90 view
2019-08-05 negar.sh 76 view
2019-05-08 aliasghar 76 view
2019-02-15 persepolistmm 70 view
2018-10-22 SHAHRIYAR 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Mehrdad.imn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...nment to find a great solution to solve these problem before exploring other spaces. As far ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...eek, I was reading a medicine magazine. the author said that there are a great deal...
^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
... the author said that there are a great deal of mental and physical diseases derivin...
^^^^
Line 5, column 634, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...r for government consume their money on this phenomena to guarantee peoples life whi...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, really, so, for example, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97395833333 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71135648579 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533854166667 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2130043971 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.526315789 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120017000919 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411906149961 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542554280635 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827651416189 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404268858658 0.0645574589148 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.