In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong. Others consider it as a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?
Nowadays, the crisis of paid-work children has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leeds to a moot question “whether paid works bring children important work experience and responsibility or not?”. It is a widely held view that preventing volnurable children from paid-work is highly benefitial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weght up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common beliefe that preventing children to work at an early age plays a vital role in the world of cut-throat competition. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that the majority of children are in charge of less value works, such as washing dished or cleaning the house without any worthy experiece. secondly, it can be argued that they are often paid less than adult, while they work like them. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that they are unable to achieve enough knowledge and in some cases are exploited by employers. A group of scientists, working at a prestigious university conducted that they usually neglect their lessons and are failed the exam.
However, there is no doubt that paid-work children provides people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that they will be able to promote their self-confidence and independency. Moreover, it is quite clear that they can reinforce social and cognitive skills and empower their interaction with people.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that toughen prevention in ordet to stop working children must be taken into consideration. However, as every gardem may have some weeds, the local authoriyies are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individual are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 11
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 11
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 88
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...crisis of paid-work children has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...the house without any worthy experiece. secondly, it can be argued that they are often p...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in addition, no doubt, such as, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 20.9802955665 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23389830508 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95545790006 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620338983051 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3510508462 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.769230769 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197697672632 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668920971569 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563169238017 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117799996009 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554100194662 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 77.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.