Over-packaging - responsible of consumer or producer
Nowadays, it is not difficult to find a product that is over packaged in markets. Many think that it is the responsibility of producers to control the over package issue, while some think it is the responsibility of consumer to avoid it. This essay will discuss why it is up to producers to not over package the product at the first place.
Producers should not over package products because it is not cost effective. When the package fee is higher, the sales price will be higher and absorb by consumer. For example, the branded liquor - Chivas have different type of packaging and the market researchers found that the most popular type is actually the plain type , as it is the cheapest type. Hence, producers can reduce the sales price by reduce the over package and it will benefit both producers and consumers.
Furthermore, it is everyone responsibility to conserve the environment and reduce the wastage. Over packaging required a lot of plastic or box to beautify their product outlook. A research shows that the over packaging had significantly increase the daily wastage by 180% as consumers tend to throw away as the packaging did not serve any purpose for them. Therefore, by minimize the packaging, the producers are able to reduce the wastage in the world.
In a nutshell, it is important to reduce the over packaging as it is not cost effective and caused a lot of wastage. In my opinion, I completely agree that it is responsibility of producers to not over packaging the products in the first place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-03 | Aruna Matta | 55 | view |
| 2020-06-15 | karan Kunal | 77 | view |
| 2020-06-03 | mike trazer | 55 | view |
| 2020-06-03 | mike trazer | view | |
| 2020-03-11 | gurlal sandhu | 77 | view |
- Many young people get married before finishing their study and establishing a good job. To what extant do you agree? Please explain. 72
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against old 80
- robots take over all work or have their limitation 75
- Greatest invention - internet or car 62
- Do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishments? Explain with example. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... popular type is actually the plain type , as it is the cheapest type. Hence, prod...
^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: Research
... box to beautify their product outlook. A research shows that the over packaging had signi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...at the over packaging had significantly increase the daily wastage by 180% as consumers ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kaging the products in the first place.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8275862069 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83910012604 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478927203065 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1250294322 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9230769231 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.576771613093 0.242375264174 238% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214478709207 0.0925447433944 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126902353376 0.071462118173 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.39054582893 0.151781067708 257% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097974666016 0.0609392437508 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.