The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by
The line graph illustrates the changes in using three types of transport which are car, bus and train in the UK from 1970 to 2030. Overall, we can see that there are substantial rises in commuting car and train whereas bus has an opposite trend.
As the graph shows, the number of car users almost stood at 5 million people until 1980 before increasing significantly to about 7 million in 2000. However, the figure for using car was stable again from 2000 to 2010. Fortunately, there was a good growth after unchanged period. Following this, that number is predicted to peak at 9 million in 2030. Similarly, the number of train users increased steadily from 2 million in 1970 to 3 million in 2000 before remaining constant from 2000 to 2010. Then, it is expected to reach 5 million in 2030 because there was a considerable jump after 2010.
In contrast, the number of people who commute by bus showed a slight decrease from 4 million in 1970 to 3.5 in 2010. Furthermore, it continued to decline during the later period. Thus, the fall is forecast to go down to under 3 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-16 | jaimi cherian | 44 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph illustrates the changes i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, similarly, then, thus, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63730569948 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55626895955 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580310880829 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3379886556 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3636363636 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108481662648 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415388364871 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475499230105 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817444686721 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019161129716 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.