The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make the comparison where relevant.
The given graph illustrates the key reasons of less production of agriculture land. While the table explains the affected regions including North American, Europe, and Oceania in the 1990s.
It can be clearly seen, the main reason causes the land degradation is an over-grazing in the world. While in Europe continent, the highest reason causes the degradation is a deforestation.
when it comes to pie graph, it interprets the four reasons. The first reason is an over-cultivation an account 28%. Then the second reason is an over-grazing with 35 percent, it is more than the over-cultivation. Moreover, the third reason is a deforestation with 30%, which is more than the over-cultivation and less than over-grazing.
the given table gives information about land degradation in three regions. In addition, the region has the highest degraded land is in Europe with 23 as a total percentage. Whereas, the lowest degraded land is in North America with 5%.
- The chart and graph below give information about sales and share prices for Coca-Cola.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.• You should write at least 150 words.• You should spend about 20 minutes on this tas 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 56
- Computers are being used more and more in education. Some people say that this is a positive trend, while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences.Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion. 56
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents an 61
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...es the degradation is a deforestation. when it comes to pie graph, it interprets th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ultivation and less than over-grazing. the given table gives information about lan...
^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n Europe with 23 as a total percentage. Whereas, the lowest degraded land is in North A...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, so, then, third, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27215732011 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.3794581393 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.2727272727 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0909090909 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187150921168 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769577804601 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503877121361 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125385861423 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517287782295 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.