Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
Undoubtedly, spending of money for authorities is one of the most important issues in the country. Some people argue that, authorities should spend a piece of budget for establishing railways network. However, other people believe that, the finance ministry should spent a piece of fund to expand the network of roads for buses, cars, bicycles,…..ETC. I strongly agree with the idea that spending money on railways is more beneficial than roads and I will explain reasons in the following paragraphs.
First of all, using trains considers safer than other means of transportation. The rate of accident happens by trains is less than other transports. In addition, the cost of infrastructure for railways is considered a little if compared with others. For example, a study has been concluded in some developed country showed that, the publicity of trains between the populations of those countries is around 80%.while other means of transportation is approximately 20%. As a result, most of developed countries use trains in public transportation such as metro which can seen in many capitals around the world.
Secondly, a price of tickets for trains is the cheapest if compared with others tickets for buses or cars. If we were ten years ago, we would not imagine the price of tickets nowadays. Moreover, the route of trains between mountains and deserts attracts tourists from other countries. so that, railways might increase income for a country.
Finally, trains can carry passengers as more as other means of transportation. Therefore, the traffic jam is going to decrease inside cities.
To sum up, although some people prefer buses or cars rather than trains, railways network has more acceptance in general between population especially youngsters. I totally agree that, governments around the world should specify a piece of their fund for railways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...twork of roads for buses, cars, bicycles,…..ETC. I strongly agree with the idea th...
^^
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ork of roads for buses, cars, bicycles,…..ETC. I strongly agree with the idea that...
^^
Line 2, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tween the populations of those countries is around 80%.while other means of trans...
^^
Line 2, column 570, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
... transportation such as metro which can seen in many capitals around the world. Sec...
^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...attracts tourists from other countries. so that, railways might increase income f...
^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries. so that, railways might increase income for a country. Finally, trains ...
^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ly, trains can carry passengers as more as other means of transportation. Therefor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in general, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29292929293 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97183016599 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3921243533 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4705882353 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15205549759 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529927039962 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585423055655 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837343223027 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722287971877 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.