Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
To be successful governments, they should establish plans for future, rather than focusing on solving the immediate problems. Some may advocate the claim that the urgent needs is the most importment one. However, there are many tough issues which could have been prevented long time ago. Moreover, if the authority can regulate some effective proposals, our society will be better, with good welfare, booming development, and peace.
First, many troubles could be avoided with well-designed plans. If perception of experts in the government is good enough to foresee the possible predicaments, they can struggle for a stratagem to evade it, or even improve the poor position. The authority should be able to foretell the probable obstacles and dilemmas and attempt to give people a hand. For example, professional economists in the government are capable to predict the latent depression of business and can provide some offers to the political leaders to forbid it, even creating a revival of economy.
Second, the prosperity of a nation usually needs a good plan formulated by foresighted people. Advances in technology, marketing, and science takes time. In order to enjoy in all the benefit result, the regulators for development plans have to include supporting the progresses, and the kind of aid should have started since about ten or even twenty years ago. If there is something good for future thrive, let's do it, even though the resulting interests might not be seen so soon.
Third, with exceptional tactics, many problems we encounter today could be precluded, and, in addition, we may live in a society with better well-being, higher average payment, and posperity. If experts expected, ten years ago, the swamps which overwhelm us at this time and possible development of the society and figure out the best solution and way to help, then we can feel at ease with misery and excited about the flourishing circumstance. On the other hand, if we concentrate on solving the immediate problems, we would probably be trapped in the competition and never catch up with the emerging problems, exhausting the population in the end.
Finally, good governments should work out plans for future, rather than focusing on solving the immediate problems. With this further help, many troubles could be avoided and the countries could prosper. That is, away from the fear of straits, people would lead a better live, in dreams that every thing will be better tomorrow.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-10-30 | nilka61 | 68 | view |
2013-10-03 | hellzee | 58 | view |
2013-08-02 | sh_shashi1 | 33 | view |
2013-07-17 | Ly Phuong Thao | 37 | view |
2013-06-10 | okoronkwoac | 38 | view |
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 48
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts— especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the state 69
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involv 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 95
- Integrated writingPopulations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decl 95
Sentence: Some may advocate the claim that the urgent needs is the most importment one.
Error: importment Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Third, with exceptional tactics, many problems we encounter today could be precluded, and, in addition, we may live in a society with better well-being, higher average payment, and posperity.
Error: posperity Suggestion: prosperity
flaws:
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.294 0.35
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.056 0.07
Check out online how to improve the coherence and essay organization.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 401 350
No. of Characters: 2007 1500
No. of Different Words: 220 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.475 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.005 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.65 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 149 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.278 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.825 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.722 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.294 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.527 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.056 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5