Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree?
Recently the phenomenon of learning another language from early ages and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of learning a language in childhood is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded highly thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that start learning another language from primary school can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, learning a foreign language by children between the ages 4 and 7 can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that better job opportunity as well as improving communication skills are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the globalization will require more international companies and these companies will have a strong preference to recruit multilingual staffs. Thus, the beneficial consequences of being bilingual and having more job prospects in the future apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of education, the ability to speak a new language at early ages might increase the consequences of passing the language barriers. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of remaining monolingual speaker related to this reality that the demerits of learning a new language in adulthood pertain to laziness and life burden. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of speaking the native language only is correlated negatively with poor communication skills. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of learning another language in primary school is more effective.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of speaking a new language from elementary school far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of providing better job opportunities prove the significance of learning a foreign language in early ages, but also pinpoint communication skill implication.
- With an increasing population communication via the internet and text messaging face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extend do you agree? 56
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Many people believe that they should spend their money to enjoy life at present. Others, however, think that they should save it for the future. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Many people believe that they should spend their money to enjoy life at present. Others, however, think that they should save it for the future. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age by children between the ages 4 and 7 can provide a society with some noticeab...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1207.87684729 154% => OK
No of words: 333.0 242.827586207 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58258258258 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20036723808 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57957957958 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 379.143842365 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5016133295 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.916666667 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 20.9669160288 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250960717807 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087273373398 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402846114627 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139218876289 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361955516811 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.