The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart provides information about the total amount of minutes counted in billions of making calls in the united kingdom and categorized into 3 groups between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, there were an upward trend in cell phone and national and international calls, while the local calls that was made by a fixed line showed a stability during the period with some fluctuations.
First of all, in the first 4 years of the study, using mobile phones for making calls was extremely low, where it scored less than 10 billions minutes until 1998. Then, it was increased sharply in the following 3 years and it was about 13 and 40 billions in 1999 and 2000 respectively, and finally reached the top in 2002 and scored approximately 45 billions minutes.
For the international calls, it was started more than cell calls around 40 billions minutes, then it increased steadily during the period till it reached the uppermost in 2002 and was achieved more than 60 billions minutes.
Finally, local calls were the biggest category, it was experienced a sharp rose in the first 4 years and reached the peak in 1999 and it was 90 billions minutes, but it showed a significant decline and stabilized in 2002 and it was about 71 billions minutes.
- Climate change is now an accepted threat to our planet but there is not enough political action to control excessive consumerism and pollution Do you agree 86
- The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand 42
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 91
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 84
- the line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries, and the pie chart shows the percentage of books by type that were borrowed over this time. summarize the information by selecting and 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, so, then, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79439252336 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62568592372 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514018691589 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.7715597409 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.0 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.6666666667 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174654089036 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10642040872 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793199954122 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116012798116 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838489478899 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.