Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today, there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. Do you agree or disagree?
In the modern world, with the rapid development of technology, people hold different views about whether teaching a wide range of learners in traditional schools or teaching everything online. I totally disagree with the idea that people should replace the old teaching method by online study for following reasons.
First of all, studying in traditional school is a great way absorbs not only academic knowledge but also a moral lesson, which make students become responsible citizens in the future. This is because, in university or college, lecturers is a person which transfers the information in textbooks for students and instructs them social skills such as politeness, honesty, respect toward the older people. This lead to the comprehensive development of learners and make them built a stronger community in the long run. In contrast, students obtain knowledge through the Internet by cutting-edge gadgets can not deeply understand these lessons which were provided in an educational institute.
Secondly, studying with the fellows surrounding concentrate on the lesson easily than the independent study by a laptop or tablet. In tradition school, students tend to give not only the knowledge but also the motivation to study. In contrary, online study is extremely distracted by game online or social network. For example, a report of Unite State government showed that in 2017, 90% students studied the old teaching method understand throughout and have a better score than learners obtain knowledge completely online.
Last but not least, several places, especially in rural areas do not have sufficient facilities and infrastructure, therefore they can not access the Internet and enrol distance learning course. Thus, studying by the old way is still the most useful method to give knowledge to students. It is trued that, students deserved received knowledge and if everything has to do online, they perhaps hard to enhance their educational level.
In conclusion, although the online study has their fundamental advantages, I still support for the idea that people should pursue the traditional teaching method, which is giving the lectures in the large classroom with a whole host of students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-12 | jagrit sharma | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | jagrit sharma | 78 | view |
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching With the technology available today there is no justification for it and everything should be done online Do you agree or disagree 81
- You saw an advertisement for a tennis course in England but you have one or two problems and cannot stay the whole course. Write a letter to the course director. In your letter: Explain your interest in the course; Describe you problems; Find out if a ref 73
- All levels education from primary school to tertiary education should be free. To what extent do you agree with this opinion? 73
- International travel is extremely popular these days. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 84
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to course'
Suggestion: to course
...he Internet and enrol distance learning course. Thus, studying by the old way is still...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45217391304 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8614377657 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56231884058 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8245902735 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.357142857 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185073881485 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640373250165 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433765152753 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107622427559 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232536186466 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.