It is better for college students to live in schools than live at home with their parents? Do you agree or disagree?
In the educational development, some people think that college students should live an independent life in dormitories of college, it is better than live depends on their home parents. Personality, I completely agree with this issue.
On the one hand, living far away home has some advantages for the students. Firstly, college students can make a living on their own. Since they need to manage their own money to expenditure for foods, clothes and shopping. In other words, the majority of students seek a temporary job near the school to gain work experience and make a little bit money to cover the daily expenses; moreover, others might spend time participating in youth clubs and recreational activities on campus. These elements make students are personal autonomy, so they can more mature in the society, and gain more knowledge and experiences before they graduate their college.
On the other hand, living with their parents is also good ideas. Supporting their parents makes students can concentrate to study well in their college because they do not need to concern about subsistence expenses. Moreover, the valid atmosphere at home makes students feel comfortable and ease strain after studying in their college. However, sometimes students can be confined freedom when they live with their family. For example, some students are been indoor supervision, and their time is controlled by their parent. Therefore, comparing to live in school I think that college students reach 18 years old, they need to live alone or their friends instead of their family.
In conclusion, I still believe that living in school have more benefits than at home. We need to experience the life and try to learn the knowledge from schoolmate. All of these offers more opportunities to develop the student skill and ability, and willingness to approach every challenge in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-16 | Hoangduyphuc | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 72
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The illustrations below show how chocolate is produced 88
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Topic The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...hool to gain work experience and make a little bit money to cover the daily expenses; more...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19407894737 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70095837805 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569078947368 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7202758925 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461689795303 0.244688304435 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1585297981 0.084324248473 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962078617434 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278513815625 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103361603386 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.