Topic: The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the Tourist Information Office in one city was received the number of inquiries in person, and by letter/email and telephone from January to June in 2011.
Overall, the number of inquiries in person and telephone increased over the following six months, while that of inquiries by letter/email decreased steadily. Moreover, the Tourist Information Office is gotten the best of inquiry by directing to a customer in June.
In January, the figure for inquiries in person initiated over 400 inquiries, which numbers were lower than that for letter/email and telephone....
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-03-13 | ross_diadame | 73 | view |
2019-07-25 | Harrykaur | 56 | view |
2021-01-22 | rozimboyolimboyev | view | |
2019-09-20 | Chinkiarora | 61 | view |
2019-03-30 | Varsha stha | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- People think that children nowadays have more freedom. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The maps show the library five years ago and now 54
- In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 73
- The illustrations below show how chocolate is produced 88
Comments
The given line graph
The given line graph illustrates the number of questions received by tourist information office in person, by emails and by telephone in the year 2011 over a spell from January to June.
Overall, most of the inquiries were in person and telephone although, the least queries received through the email/letter. Moreover, over the complete six month period personal investigations were at the top of the list followed by the other two telephone and email/letter. While, email/letter inquiries consistently decreased in the given spell. In the beginning of january, physical inquiries initiated from slightly more than 400 but it raised up to the highest level compared to other categories in the month of june which was almost touching 1850. Contrary to this, telephone complains began from less than 800 and after fluctuations ended at 1600 in June but lower than physical inquiries.
Meanwhile, email/letter inquiries remained almost constant right up to March after this it experienced a sudden decline from 750 to less than 400 approximately in may and afterwards till June.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph illustrates the Tourist Inform...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ephone from January to June in 2011. Overall, the number of inquiries in pers...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by directing to a customer in June. In January, the figure for inquiries in ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er 600 and 800 inquiries respectively. Over the next six months, there was a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22346368715 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95045064609 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486033519553 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.560885195 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.875 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222303039341 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122822874667 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837914291016 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178719049163 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898923825915 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.