The tables show us the quantity of exports being transported through Rotterdam over a ten year period, and the level of taxation imposed on the goods at destination.
The table charts depict the proportion of exports being transported via Rotterdam in 2002 and 2012, and the level of taxation imposed on goods at destination.
Regarding the volumes, total exports rose insignificantly, reaching 18600 tons by 2020. However, the general trend for the volumes was to decrease. For example, the rates for Europe- the largest destination- had declined by 500 million tons by 2012, compared to the 2002 figures, and the United States decreased to 3,900 million tons. China and Latin America export volumes dipped dropped moderately by 100 and 300 million tons accordingly. By marked contrast, volumes to Asia Pacific and Australasia more than trebled, comprising 2550 and 2300 million tons in 2012. The “other” areas remained static over a given timescale, at 350 million tons.
Turning to taxation, the amount of taxes imposed increased considerably in almost all countries that demonstrated a decline in volumes, hitting 2% in the United States, China and Latin America, and rising to 8 in Europe, while the growth zones Asia Pacific and Australasia reduced taxation massively by 3%. The “other” zones again showed stable taxation levels over a period, at only 2%.
Overall, there is a clear correlation between the amount of export volumes and taxes imposed upon good at destination.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-20 | GulyamovOT | 89 | view |
| 2018-03-20 | GulyamovOT | 84 | view |
- The tables show us the quantity of exports being transported through Rotterdam over a ten year period, and the level of taxation imposed on the goods at destination. 89
- The tables show us the quantity of exports being transported through Rotterdam over a ten year period, and the level of taxation imposed on the goods at destination. 84
- The first graph below shows the weight (in tonnes) of fruit produced by a farm during each month in 2013, and also the amount (in tonnes) of fertiliser used. The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month (in millimetres.) 93
- The chart below shows the number of passengers arriving at a train station per hour across a day and also the average price in US Dollars of their tickets Write a report summarising the information Select and describe the main features and make comparison 59
- chart 1 below shows a normal price of a tablet 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, regarding, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40952380952 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97234418128 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604761904762 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7462914114 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25311896939 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103438656082 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135550226808 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208412942203 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14694712383 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.