The charts show (Chart a) the average speed of urban zone traffic (in kilometres per hour or kph) in a number of countries over a fifty year period, including a future estimate; and also (Chart b) the total number of urban zones per country (in thousands.)
The table charts provide data regarding the average velocity of city traffic throughout five decades with a prediction for the future and the proportion of urban areas by country, in thousands.
The most striking point is that the general trend for speed is to rise and then decrease. For example, the rate for France and the United States surged from 60 and 45 kph in 1970 to a peak of 86 and 57 kph in 1990, before tailing off to forecasted 52 and 43 kph accordingly in 2020. In addition to this, Great Britain and Russia follow the similar trend, rising to 53 and 56 kph in 2010 before levelling off to below the starting level. The same phenomenon can be seen in Canada with a decline from 69 kph to 64 kph, despite a spike of 73 kph in 2010. Brazil and Spain are the exceptions, with a slight increase by 5 and 10 kph, compared to the 1970 figures.
The rates for Chile, however, fluctuate around 51 kph, yet remain static over a period.
As far as urban zones are concerned, all countries experience expected increases of roughly 4 times by 2020, except Russia, which sees a fall of nearly half to 3,200.
To summary, the information below does not suggest any correlation between increasing urban zones and average traffic speed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-20 | GulyamovOT | 65 | view |
- chart 1 below shows a normal price of a tablet 78
- chart 1 below shows a normal price of a tablet 84
- The first graph below shows the weight in tonnes of fruit produced by a farm during each month in 2013 and also the amount in tonnes of fertiliser used The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month in millimetres 61
- The first graph below shows the weight (in tonnes) of fruit produced by a farm during each month in 2013, and also the amount (in tonnes) of fertiliser used. The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month (in millimetres.) 93
- chart 1 below shows a normal price of a tablet 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and then decrease. For example, the rate for France and the United States surged ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, regarding, then, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62780269058 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4872414692 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645739910314 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.355298324 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197517426958 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747831914051 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574441611432 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115250427872 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478208186438 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.