Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
The growing traffic and pollution are two main problems affecting our country. Some people believe that increasing the price of petrol is the best solution for that. Although I agree that the rise of price of petrol could solve in part these problems, I believe that some kind of vehicles could suffer from that.
On the one hand, nowadays there are an increasing number of cars and means of transport. If we look the statistics, it is evident that for each person there are at least two cars. If the price of petrol increases, many people are discouraged to get a car or bus, because, for example, bus ticket price increases too. In this way, they probably use a bike or even they go on foot. It also might be good for health.
On the other hand, a big number of special means of transport could suffer from an increasing price of petrol. If the price of petrol rises, some vehicles, like those of emergency, could have some problems. Because of this kind of vehicles depends on government, may be possible a tax increase, which has a negative impact on society. For instance, if the price of petrol for the ambulance increases, the government is forced to increase taxes, because it can’t limit the service only in particular cases.
To conclude, though I agree that increasing the price of petrol might solve traffic and pollution problem, I believe that there are more other measures to solve these problems, without to suffer the most important vehicles of country. One of these measures, may be the use of electrical cars or buses, or even bikes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Is this a positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and include any r 78
- The graph shows the average amount of money women earned as a percentage of men s earnings in the USA from 1975 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 57
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 67
- Some people have argued that videogames are a waste of time and people should spend their time and money on better hobbies Compare and contrast the benefits of video games with other hobbies In your opinion which is more useful Why 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ind of vehicles could suffer from that. On the one hand, nowadays there are an i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the service only in particular cases. To conclude, though I agree that increas...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, so, at least, for example, for instance, in particular, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7619047619 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50842212694 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501831501832 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0225375075 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8571428571 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23406166754 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810535930056 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646698448822 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157475139192 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520784271301 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.