When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive
There is no denying to this fact that with advancement in technology many traditional skills have become redundant and traditional ways of life are being lost. It is argued that there is no need to preserve traditional skills and ways, I entirely disagree with this view. I believe that there should be no stone unturned to keep traditional values and skills alive, if not so, this will result in enormous social, cultural as well as economical loss for a community. This essay shall discuss the vitality traditional skills and ways in our lives.
Undoubtedly, traditional skills and customs are a foundation of a certain community, and without its foundation sooner or later, community is doomed to extinct. Customs and skills of a community carry their heritage along with them, it is a form of undocumented and documented history. For instance, a distinct style of pottery making is assigned to every gharana of Rajput dynasty, and only by sculpture designed on a pot, gharana and culture of Rajput family can be recognized. Stories of great Hindu gods and warriors painted on the roofs and walls of various palaces and temples around the country are a form of documented history. There skills are being lost today in era of technology, if it continued to occur we will have nothing to show to our precedents.
Furthermore, with loss of these skills, people performing these skills are getting jobless, hence financial burden is increased on economy of a country. By preserving these skills economy can be boosted in a big way. Firstly, by employing skilled workers again financial burden will be lifted. Secondly, by exporting skilled art work big revenues can be generated and own culture can be promoted at global level .
To sum up with, preserving traditional arts and ways of life is a necessity for a better future, as loss of these skills and values, are going to be detrimental at social as well as economical level.
- Nowadays families are not as close as they used to be.What do you think are the causes of this?What can be done to make families closer? 73
- Discipline is an ever increasing problem in modern schools. Some people think that discipline should be the responsibilities of teachers, while other thinks this is role of parents 73
- It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together Include any relevant examples from your experience 44
- scientist predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in futuredo you think this is a positive or negative development? 91
- The position of women in society has changed markedly in the last twenty years. Many ofthe problems young people now experience, such as juvenile delinquency, arise from thefact that many married women now work and are not at home to care for their childr 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 435, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...in enormous social, cultural as well as economical loss for a community. This essay shall ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...onomy of a country. By preserving these skills economy can be boosted in a big way. Fi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... culture can be promoted at global level . To sum up with, preserving traditio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97230769231 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78428943905 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541538461538 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7613214511 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19775836133 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752334764673 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444514914581 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120069344961 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406551403277 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.