Nowadays people use social media to keep in touch with others and be aware of news Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

Nowadays people use social media to keep in touch with others and be aware of news. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages

In today's technological era of competitive world, social media play a pivotal role to spread the news easily of every corner of this world. Those days when people used to send written message in wrapped with pigeon's foot. While it is possible to claim that social media cuts distance in term of news. My personal view that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. I shall discuss this argument by analyzing the both sides and explore the logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are multifarious advantages which are associated with social media. One of them is connection between people to have information about their vicinity. For example, news channel provide this information instantly, In addition, social media like google map, Facebook, LinkedIn and many more which fulfill the requirement of their query and fill the communication gap. Secondly, These social medias become nurture of thought of people and explore their next move.
Those people who argue that social media have different view and say that it is not an accurately thing. Negative exists where positive exists in this world. It is argued that these social media are unsecured and pass personal information to wrong hands. For example, wrong or fake news are cultivated in society which outrage the many violent incidents. Moreover, it has been said that these social media can espouse the embezzler and make corruption in severe loss of money to nation.
In recapitulate, there are strong arguments of both sides argument and my personal view believe the notion to emphasize the social media act as activists for humanitarian. I would recommend that securing these social media and reporting bad phishing incident to surveillance department who have regime to punish these corrupt people.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-08 vishav partap singh 73 view
2020-01-08 vishav partap singh 89 view
2020-05-03 arezooch1 44 view
2020-01-16 Baljinder dhariwal 77 view
2018-04-15 acosta 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user manish123 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n message in wrapped with pigeons foot. While it is possible to claim that social med...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es and explore the logical conclusion. Firstly, there are multifarious advantag...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of people and explore their next move. Those people who argue that social media...
^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('accurately') instead an adjective, or a noun ('thing') instead of another adjective.
...e different view and say that it is not an accurately thing. Negative exists where positive exists ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion in severe loss of money to nation. In recapitulate, there are strong argume...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27402135231 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66989310182 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5871886121 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9884191623 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.625 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2732938498 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923573774628 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046497526455 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170110010457 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064841794747 0.0609392437508 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.