The passage of reading and listening is all about a painter named Rembrandt ,he was a famous painter of his time. In both listening and reading passages it describes that there are few doubts about the paintings of rembrandt the painting name was "portrait of an elderly women in a white bonnet".so how the lecture contradicts with the reading passage,it decribes as,
Firstly in the reading passage it says that there is inconsistency of the dressing of the woman in the painting, as she is wearing a white linen cap that is only worn by servants and the coat she is wearing is luxerious with fur colloras no sevantt can afford that which cannot be the mistake a famous painter rembrandt can do bu it contrast the lecture says that the painting was again painted by some one so the colour difference is due to new and old colours .
secondly the reading passage states that rembrandt was a mster of light and dark shadows of painting but in this painting the face is apperantly illuminated by light reflections and its by mistaken appearing in a shadow due to dark fur collor it absorbs all the light and the face is not so illuminted but the lecture contadicts by stating that the original painting is in light color and it illuminates due to light colors.
finally the reading passage states that the pannel used in the painting is made up of glued woods joined together which the rembrandt never used but the lecture indicates that the actual size of the wooden pannel was small so to make it bigger they joined it with few wooden pieces.
The reading passage and listening is about a painter named Rembrandt who was a famous painter of his time. Both the listening and reading passages describe that there are few doubts about the paintings of Rembrandt the painting name was "portrait of elderly women in a white bonnet". So the lecture is in contradiction with the reading passage and provides three evidences to refute each of the the reasons given in the lecture.
Firstly, the reading passage suggests that there is inconsistency of the dressing of the woman in the painting, as she is wearing a white linen cap that is only worn by servants and the coat she is wearing is luxurious with fur collars no servant can afford that which cannot be the mistake a famous painter Rembrandt can do. However, the lecture claims that the painting was again painted by someone so the colour difference is due to new and old colours.
Secondly, the reading passage mentions that Rembrandt was a master of light and dark shadows of painting but in this painting the face is apparently illuminated by light reflections and it is by mistake that it is appearing in a shadow due to dark fur color it absorbs all the light and the face is not so illuminated. Nevertheless, lecture contradicts the reason provided in the passage by arguing that the original painting is in light color and it illuminates due to light colors.
Finally, the reading passage states that the panel used in the painting is made up of glued woods joined together which the Rembrandt never used but the lecture indicates that the actual size of the wooden panel was small so to make it bigger they joined it with few wooden pieces.
To recapitulate, the reading passage and the lecture are in opposition to each other. The lecture efficiently provides three evidences which contradicts the reasons given in the reading passage. By doing this the lecture successfully casts doubt on the validity of the reading passage.
women in a portrait
The passage of reading and listening is all about a painter named Rembrandt ,he was a famous painter of his time. In both listening and reading passages it describes that there are few doubts about the paintings of rembrandt the painting name was "portrait of an elderly women in a white bonnet".so how the lecture contradicts with the reading passage,it decribes as,
Firstly in the reading passage it says that there is inconsistency of the dressing of the woman in the painting, as she is wearing a white linen cap that is only worn by servants and the coat she is wearing is luxerious with fur colloras no sevantt can afford that which cannot be the mistake a famous painter rembrandt can do bu it contrast the lecture says that the painting was again painted by some one so the colour difference is due to new and old colours .
secondly the reading passage states that rembrandt was a mster of light and dark shadows of painting but in this painting the face is apperantly illuminated by light reflections and its by mistaken appearing in a shadow due to dark fur collor it absorbs all the light and the face is not so illuminted but the lecture contadicts by stating that the original painting is in light color and it illuminates due to light colors.
finally the reading passage states that the pannel used in the painting is made up of glued woods joined together which the rembrandt never used but the lecture indicates that the actual size of the wooden pannel was small so to make it bigger they joined it with few wooden pieces.
The reading passage and listening is about a painter named Rembrandt who was a famous painter of his time. Both the listening and reading passages describe that there are few doubts about the paintings of Rembrandt the painting name was "portrait of elderly women in a white bonnet". So the lecture is in contradiction with the reading passage and provides three evidences to refute each of the the reasons given in the lecture.
Firstly, the reading passage suggests that there is inconsistency of the dressing of the woman in the painting, as she is wearing a white linen cap that is only worn by servants and the coat she is wearing is luxurious with fur collars no servant can afford that which cannot be the mistake a famous painter Rembrandt can do. However, the lecture claims that the painting was again painted by someone so the colour difference is due to new and old colours.
Secondly, the reading passage mentions that Rembrandt was a master of light and dark shadows of painting but in this painting the face is apparently illuminated by light reflections and it is by mistake that it is appearing in a shadow due to dark fur color it absorbs all the light and the face is not so illuminated. Nevertheless, lecture contradicts the reason provided in the passage by arguing that the original painting is in light color and it illuminates due to light colors.
Finally, the reading passage states that the panel used in the painting is made up of glued woods joined together which the Rembrandt never used but the lecture indicates that the actual size of the wooden panel was small so to make it bigger they joined it with few wooden pieces.
To recapitulate, the reading passage and the lecture are in opposition to each other. The lecture efficiently provides three evidences which contradicts the reasons given in the reading passage. By doing this the lecture successfully casts doubt on the validity of the reading passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g is all about a painter named Rembrandt ,he was a famous painter of his time. In ...
^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...g name was 'portrait of an elderly women in a white bonnet'.so how the lect...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ure contradicts with the reading passage,it decribes as, Firstly in the readin...
^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contrasts'?
Suggestion: contrasts
...a famous painter rembrandt can do bu it contrast the lecture says that the painting was ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 462, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...difference is due to new and old colours . secondly the reading passage state...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...ce is due to new and old colours . secondly the reading passage states that rembran...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...t illuminates due to light colors. finally the reading passage states that the pan...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: finally,
...t illuminates due to light colors. finally the reading passage states that the pan...
^^^^^^^
Line 46, column 403, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...vides three evidences to refute each of the the reasons given in the lecture. Fir...
^^^^^^^
Line 46, column 403, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...vides three evidences to refute each of the the reasons given in the lecture. Fir...
^^^^^^^
Line 46, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ute each of the the reasons given in the lecture. Firstly, the reading passa...
^^
Line 52, column 212, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...eflections and it is by mistake that it is appearing in a shadow due to dark fur color it ab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 52, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dicts the reason provided in the passage by arguing that the original painting is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 40.0 10.4613686534 382% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 7.30242825607 315% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 25.0 12.0772626932 207% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 22.412803532 205% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 30.3222958057 254% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3030.0 1373.03311258 221% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 609.0 270.72406181 225% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97536945813 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96768813016 4.04702891845 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67378808128 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.288998357964 0.540411800872 53% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 901.8 419.366225166 215% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 40.0 21.2450331126 188% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 167.245793835 49.2860985944 339% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 202.0 110.228320801 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.6 21.698381199 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.09492273731 220% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517065618087 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.246805764593 0.0996497079465 248% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.232173890135 0.0662205650399 351% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283547893061 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.248594380443 0.0443174109184 561% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 13.3589403974 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 53.8541721854 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.0289183223 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 10.7273730684 252% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.498013245 171% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.