Whether studying films at school is as important as studying literature? Do you think school should have curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theater centuries ago?
Studying films at schools is as important as studying literature created heating argument among certain group of people. Some people believe that study of the century old dramas and plays by pupils in their student career is beneficial for understanding human evolution and development. Others reject this notion and argue that its downsides cannot be ignored. The substantial influence of studying drama for high school students has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. I completely disagree with the statement that schools should not ask students for curriculum to play century of old drama. This essay would further elaborate both sides in detail with justifying reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, the prime benefit of studying drama and other history art makes students aware of the traditions, cultures, customs, rituals and life style of people of bygone centuries. This awareness about various communities assist pupils in understanding human behaviors. For example, Shakespeare is not famous dramatist in the 16th century but now his dramas hold the highest views in you tube. Besides this, young generations will learn lessons from dramas and will try to avoid those mistakes done by ancient people in present era. Thus literature teaches younger students to travel in right path and avoid wrong customs.
On the flip side, studying theaters during student career is considered as sheer wastage of time and energy. In the fast growing world, youngsters are required to pay attention towards modern sciences and technologies which eventually help them in excel in academic and professional fields. Furthermore, drama, tragic, romantic plays of old days distract young generation minds. For example, in a society where more inventions are happening, students should be more concentrated on technologies that helps them to choose a career in future.
To conclude, it is drawn that studying literature in schools and colleges is not beneficial for student growth. In a nutshell, high school students should pay more attention to modern developments and innovations instead of old play dramas
- Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on peoples life and work 83
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease Pros Cons 94
- Whether design of buildings will have a positive ornegative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 88
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... done by ancient people in present era. Thus literature teaches younger students to ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...gies that helps them to choose a career in future. To conclude, it is drawn that study...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1207.87684729 152% => OK
No of words: 340.0 242.827586207 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41764705882 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75457467877 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 139.433497537 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4583310199 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.352941176 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.25397266985 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407708145324 0.242375264174 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125999670132 0.0925447433944 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115462263503 0.071462118173 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248449969588 0.151781067708 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12759494203 0.0609392437508 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.