The Table below shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.
The table shows the percentage of several brand mobile phones were sold around the world. Those were produced between 2005 and 2006.
Overall, the percentage of sales mobile phone did not show a big change. Firstly, the brand of Nokia gained the highest percentage, 32.5% in 2005, amount others. And then, it improved to 3.5% in 2006 over the world. At the second level, consumer preferred use Motorola than Samsung. It was 17.7 (2005) and got 21.1 (2006).
Sonny Ericson and LG were in the middle of percentages, it were around 63% to 7.4%. Mobile global consumers were less trust to BenQ mobile. This product just obtained 4.9% in 2005 and declined to 2.4 in 2006. Several unknown kinds also contributed a big improvement from 16,2% to 18.20%.
To sum up, the percentage of world mobile phone users could not predicted their passions by using mobile phone. It was able to change increase or decrease in a year.
- The chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to other countries.Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevans. 83
- Children s lives in the past had many differences in daily activities compare with children s live nowadays Absolutely there were advantages and disadvantages of children s experiences that were difficult to find in the present day 60
- The chart below show information about honey-bee colonies and honey production in the US.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 75
- The Internet is probably the most significant invention of the last 30 years. Without it, our lives would be completely different.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 73
- The table below shows information about travelling to work in one US city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 87
flaws:
No. of Words: 158 200
Avg. Sentence Length: 12.154 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.231 7.5
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.022 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 10
No. of Words: 158 200
No. of Characters: 720 1000
No. of Different Words: 102 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.545 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.557 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.263 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 29 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 19 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 10 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 12.154 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.231 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.385 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.349 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.548 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.022 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4