The Table below shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.
The table shows the percentage of several brand mobile phones were sold around the world. Those were produced between 2005 and 2006.
Overall, the percentage of sales mobile phone did not show a big change. Firstly, the brand of Nokia gained the highest percentage, 32.5% in 2005, amount others. And then, it improved to 3.5% in 2006 over the world. At the second level, consumer preferred use Motorola than Samsung. It was 17.7 (2005) and got 21.1 (2006).
Sonny Ericson and LG were in the middle of percentages, it were around 63% to 7.4%. Mobile global consumers were less trust to BenQ mobile. This product just obtained 4.9% in 2005 and declined to 2.4 in 2006. Several unknown kinds also contributed a big improvement from 16,2% to 18.20%.
To sum up, the percentage of world mobile phone users could not predicted their passions by using mobile phone. It was able to change increase or decrease in a year.
- The diagram below show the side of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 65
- The charts below show information about animals and rainfall at the Nboro Nature Reserve.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 83
- The International tourism has becomme cheaper and cheaper and more countries are opening their doors to welcome more tourist.Do the advantages of the International tourism out weight its disadvantages? 70
- The Table and bar chart show how journey times in a city center changes after improvements were made to the transport network, and the costs of using different forms of transport in the city.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 80
- The table below shows information about travelling to work in one US city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 87
flaws:
No. of Words: 158 200
Avg. Sentence Length: 12.154 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.231 7.5
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.022 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 10
No. of Words: 158 200
No. of Characters: 720 1000
No. of Different Words: 102 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.545 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.557 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.263 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 29 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 19 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 10 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 12.154 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.231 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.385 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.349 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.548 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.022 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4