TPO3
The article and the lecture discuss the Rembrandt's paintings. The author believes that the painting was not portraiting by Rembrandt and gives many reasons for support. On another hand, the professor casts doubt on each author's reasons.
First of all, regarding the inconsistent dressing. The author assumes that Rembrandt would not have been blamed for such an error. However, the professor refutes this point. He says that after proper examination and analysis they found that someone who added the colors to the original portrait after hundreds of year.
Secondly, regarding illumination imperfect. The professor believes that once color removed the original portrait is very realistic because of the simple light clothes reflect the light and resemble Rembrandt's ability in painting.
Finally, regarding the pieces of panel. The author assumes that the portrait was made by several pieces of wood glued together. However, the professor asserts that the original portrait was depicted in single wood panels.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, regarding, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 1373.03311258 63% => OK
No of words: 155.0 270.72406181 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58064516129 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 4.04702891845 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5333242054 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 145.348785872 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 419.366225166 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6536438459 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.0833333333 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.9166666667 21.698381199 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 53.8541721854 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.2 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.