cities are now expanding;the government should make better network for public transport aor should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

cities are now expanding;the government should make better network for public transport aor should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of city expansion and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of building more roads is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. Therefore, I am inclined to believe that facilitating car ownership can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a governmental standpoint, improving public transportation network can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of road safety and public safety, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered traffic restraint policies. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both transportation costs and cutting public spending apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of transportation, using personal cars might increase the consequences of the traffic jam. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of parking facilities relate to this reality that the demerits of private cars would pertain to the road construction project. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of transportation development is correlated negatively with road pricing. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of road transport industry.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of city roads expansion far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a green fuel prove the significance of a clean fuel, but also pinpoint developing transportation implications.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-04-26 alireza-kia 77 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...undly believe that the benefits of city roads expansion far outweigh its drawbacks. N...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74242424242 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36342307541 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662878787879 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4102107644 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179423639557 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556518997573 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290023001759 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949008842135 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238353488925 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.